Hvidbjerg Logistik

Three documents, all read, none executed: a security questionnaire of 3 Apr 2026, a draft Growth proposal of 10 Apr 2026 and a final-status Growth proposal of 15 Apr 2026 at £62k contract total. No signed order form is held, so no price or service level is contracted.

Executed: no document for Hvidbjerg Logistik has a stored status of executed, so no price, term, start date or service level is contracted on paper. Every executed term below is null for that reason.

Open items: the Hvidbjerg Logistik - Proposal of 15 Apr 2026, written by Matteo Ricci, is stored as final but is a proposal, not an order form. It quotes £12k implementation and £50k Year 1 subscription, £62k contract total, with payment due on or before go-live.

The Hvidbjerg Logistik - Proposal v1 of 10 Apr 2026 is a draft. It quotes a first-year investment of £62k, then £50k a year, for 40 users and 8 connectors.

The Security Questionnaire of 3 Apr 2026 is final but sets no price or service levels. It notes SSO is available only at the Enterprise tier.

Contradictions: the draft of 10 Apr 2026 states a 99.5% uptime commitment, while the 15 Apr 2026 proposal states no availability figure. The draft also offers EU data residency and cancellation on 30 days' notice, which the read of the later proposal does not record.

The fee figures agree across both proposals: each totals £62k for the first year with £50k for the subscription. The customer could still rely on the draft's cancellation and residency wording, so the order form should settle both points.

Commitments: none are live, because no executed document exists. The 1 business hour priority response, the nightly refresh by 07:00 and the quarterly business reviews in the 15 Apr 2026 proposal are offers, not obligations.

Gaps: the documents do not show whether an order form was signed, who would sign for the customer, or any start, end or renewal date. The roll-up covers all three documents held.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026