Thornwick Haulage

Thornwick Haulage: both documents held were read and neither is executed. A draft proposal of 7 Feb 2024 and a final proposal of 12 Feb 2024 both price Starter at £26k for Year One and £20k a year after. No executed order form is held, so no contracted terms are evidenced.

Executed: nothing. Neither document has a stored status of executed, so there are no contracted price, dates, billing or service levels to report.

Open items: the draft Starter proposal v1 of 7 Feb 2024 sets Year One at £26k and annual renewal from Year Two at £20k. Its footer says it is not binding until signed and was valid for 30 days.

Open items: the final Starter proposal of 12 Feb 2024 sets out £6,000 implementation over four weeks, a £20k Year 1 subscription and £26k total Year 1. Its text says an order form would follow for signature, so it is also an open item.

Contradictions: the two proposals agree on price and Starter scope (15 users, four connectors). They differ on terms: the 7 Feb 2024 draft states Net 30 days, billed annually in advance, while the 12 Feb 2024 final states no payment terms.

Contradictions: the 12 Feb 2024 final adds a twelve-month term from go-live and a 90-day renewal notice period, which the 7 Feb 2024 draft does not state. Neither document binds, so neither position is contracted.

Commitments: none are live from executed paper. Any figure quoted to Thornwick Haulage should be named as a proposal figure, with its date.

Gaps: the documents do not show whether an order form was signed, who signed, the start or end date, or any availability, P1 response, refresh or service credit terms. Finance should check for an executed order form before relying on either proposal.

AI · claude-opus-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026