B-Glass
Daniel Okafor

Calderbrook Housing Group / BG-Demo – Check In

Callcompleted

Calderbrook Housing Group logo Calderbrook Housing Group · 13 May 2025 14:15

Helen Marsden flagged an arrears split in the board pack that does not reconcile, said IT leadership is discussing an in-house platform, and asked for a usage summary she can defend. Core group is nine or ten of forty.

What was said

What this says

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Helen Marsden flagged an arrears split in the board pack that does not reconcile, said IT leadership is discussing an in-house platform, and asked for a usage summary she can defend. Core group is nine or ten of forty.

What happened: On the 13 May 2025 check-in Helen raised former and current tenant arrears that do not reconcile in section four of the board pack. On screen, Daniel Okafor showed old tenancies with an end date but a status still active, which fits transfers but is not yet proven.

Customer view: Helen said her team lives in the brain and the platform has been stable, with the reconciliation being the issue. She said the in-house idea is not her plan and that no decision has been made.

Commercial: Daniel confirmed Growth at £44k a year, with the order form and invoices matching. Helen wants a usage summary for IT leadership before the 1 Sep 2025 end date.

Watch: Weekly users are down, and a core of nine or ten use it properly out of forty licensed.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Themes

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
Theme
Arrears reconciliation, in-house plan
Importance
renewal
Sentiment
mixed
Voice
champion

Who was there

BG-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • Helen Marsden to send the three tenancy references today so Daniel Okafor can compare them and the whole transfer set.
  • Daniel Okafor to update Helen on the comparison by Friday.
  • Daniel Okafor to prepare the usage summary after the reconciliation work.

Risks

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • IT leadership is drafting a business case for an in-house reporting platform before the 1 Sep 2025 renewal.
  • The arrears split does not reconcile to the housing system, and Helen needs it fixed before the board pack is signed off.
  • Weekly users are down on the previous quarter and only nine or ten of forty licensed users are regular.

Opportunities

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • A usage summary showing who asks what and which questions only the brain can answer gives Helen a case for IT leadership.
  • A session for housing officers built around their own repairs and rents questions could widen use.
  • Helen named reconciliation, lineage and speed as what the board values, which the brain already provides.

Transcript

  1. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Hello Helen, thanks for making the time. Can you hear me alright?
  2. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    I can, yes. Good afternoon, Daniel. Sorry, I'm a minute behind, I was finishing something with the performance team.
  3. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    No problem at all, it's only just gone quarter past. Is it as grey in Leeds as it is down here?
  4. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Rather. It's been drizzling since breakfast and half the office has come in with wet shoes.
  5. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Ha, same here. Well, thank you for the time anyway. I've got your account open, the usage and so on, but I'd rather hear how it's going from you first.
  6. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    That's rather why I wanted to start with something specific, if that's all right. Section four of the board pack, the arrears summary. The brain's figure for former tenant arrears doesn't reconcile to what the housing management system gives us. It's close, but it isn't the same, and the board will ask.
  7. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Of course. Just so I've got it clear, is the gap in the headline figure, or in how it splits between current and former tenants?
  8. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    The split. The headline is within a whisker. But former tenant arrears are lower in the brain and current tenant arrears are higher, by about the same amount. So something is being classified differently.
  9. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Mm. That pattern usually means a tenancy end date being read differently, rather than a record going missing. Have you got a couple of example accounts where it differs?
  10. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    I have three. I'll send you the references after the call, I don't want to read them out loud. But they're all tenancies that ended in the last few months, and in each one there was a transfer to another property.
  11. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Right, transfers. That's helpful, actually. A transfer can look like an ending followed by a new start, and depending on how the housing system flags it, we might be treating the old tenancy as current until the new one is confirmed.
  12. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Which would explain it. But I'd want to see that in the data, Daniel, not take it as a theory. Can you show me the source?
  13. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Fair. Let me share my screen, give me a moment. Can you see the lineage page?
  14. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Not yet. Ah, there it is.
  15. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    So this is the arrears model for your account. It reads the tenancy table every night, and this field here, tenancy status, is what drives the current versus former split. I'll filter to tenancies with a transfer flag, so we can look at the pattern without opening anyone's record.
  16. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Good. Yes, I'd prefer that.
  17. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Right. So there are a fair few. And look at this column. The end date is filled in on the old tenancy, but the status still says active for some of them.
  18. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    So those would be sitting in current when they should be in former.
  19. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    That's what it looks like. Which would push current up and former down by the same amount, as you said. I don't want to claim it's the whole explanation until we've matched it to your three references, but it fits.
  20. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    I'd want it to be the whole explanation. If it's only part of it, I have a different problem for section four.
  21. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Understood. What I can do is ask our data engineers to run a comparison on your three and on the whole transfer set, and come back to you with a line by line result. I'll come back to you by Friday with where we've got to.
  22. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Friday would be fine. The pack is signed off the week after, so I need to know before then whether to footnote it.
  23. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Just to close the loop on that, then. You send the three references today, we compare, and I update you on Friday.
  24. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Yes. Thank you. While you've still got the screen up, can I ask about the complaints data? It's the other area where my team gets questions.
  25. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Of course. Let me open the connectors page. Yes, everything is showing as loading on its schedule, and nothing is flagged on my side. The complaints source is in there with the rest.
  26. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    That's reassuring. The board does ask whether complaints and repairs line up with the arrears picture, so I want to be sure they're current.
  27. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Understood. I'll stop sharing now. Yeah. Right. Can I ask about the wider picture? How is the team finding it day to day?
  28. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Mostly well. My own team lives in it. The tickets and the tenant calls sitting next to the repairs data, that's what we bought it for, and it still does that.
  29. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Good. I'll be straight with you, I did notice the number of people logging in each week is down a little on the previous quarter. Nothing dramatic, but I'd rather ask than assume.
  30. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    That doesn't surprise me. Some of that is people. Two of the analysts who were using it daily have moved onto the complaints return project, so they're not in there as much. And honestly, some of the housing officers asked a lot at the start and have settled back into their usual reports.
  31. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    That's a common shape, to be fair. Questions come in a burst after go-live and then find their level. You've got forty licensed users. Are you using most of them, or are there some that could be freed up?
  32. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    We've got a core group, perhaps nine or ten, who use it properly every week. The rest have a login and dip in now and then. I wouldn't claim we're using forty.
  33. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    That's honest, and thank you. Is there anything stopping the wider group? Is it training, or is it that they don't have a reason to ask?
  34. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    A bit of both. The housing officers want answers in their own language, rents and repairs, and they find the chat a bit generic. My team gets on fine because we know the tables. And I should say, the executives mostly see it through the board dashboards my team built. They open those, they don't ask the brain directly. So the usage numbers undersell it a bit.
  35. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Mm, that's a really good point, and I'll make sure it's in whatever I put together for you. Would a short session with the officers, built around their own repairs and rents questions, be useful? I could set one up.
  36. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    It might. Let me think about timing, they're stretched with the complaints return. Can I come back to you on that?
  37. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Of course, no rush at all.
  38. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    There's something else, and I'd rather you heard it from me. The group's IT leadership have been talking about an in-house platform for reporting, built on our own data warehouse. I want to be clear that it isn't my plan. I've been asked to give a view on what we'd need from it, and what the brain does today that we'd have to replace.
  39. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    I appreciate you telling me, Helen. How far along is that conversation?
  40. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Early. There's a business case being drafted, and I haven't seen it. Nothing is decided. I'm just saying so that you're not surprised, because the contract runs to 1 Sep 2025 and the question will come up before then.
  41. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    That's very fair, and I'd much rather know. Can I ask what the board cares about most from it? Because if I understand what you'd need to replace, I can be useful to you whichever way it goes.
  42. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    The reconciliation, frankly. If the numbers tie to the housing system and I can show the lineage, the board trusts the pack. That's what I'd have to reproduce. And the speed. Tenant calls, repairs tickets, complaints and arrears all in one place, without my team stitching spreadsheets together.
  43. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    That's a clear list. Yeah. And on the commercial side, you're on Growth at £44,000 a year, and the order form and what we've invoiced are the same figure. So there's nothing to untangle there. I'll make sure that's all tidy for whenever your colleagues want to look at it.
  44. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Yes, finance haven't raised anything. No invoices overdue, as far as I know.
  45. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    No, nothing overdue on our side either. And no tickets in the last month, which is either a good sign or a quiet one, so I'm asking.
  46. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Good, I think. It's been stable. The nightly refresh has been there when we've needed it. It's the reconciliation that's the issue, not the platform being down.
  47. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Good to hear. Is there anything you'd want to see from us before that renewal conversation, so you have it for whoever's making the case?
  48. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    A usage summary I can put in front of IT leadership. Who's asking what, how often, and which questions only the brain could answer. Not a sales document. Something I can defend.
  49. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    I can do that. I'll put it together after the reconciliation work, so it isn't competing for attention. Is that all right?
  50. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    That's sensible. Let's get section four right first.
  51. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Agreed. And Helen, whatever the group decides, if it would help to write down what the brain does today, the sources, the joins, the nightly timings, I'm happy to do that with you. It's your record of what you'd need, not a pitch.
  52. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    I might take you up on that. Not yet. Let me see the business case first, if they let me.
  53. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Of course. So, just to close the loop. You send the three references today, and I come back to you on Friday with the comparison on the transfers. You think about a session for the housing officers. And I prepare a usage summary, after the reconciliation work. Anything I've missed?
  54. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    No, I think that's everything. I'll send those references as soon as we're off.
  55. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Lovely. Thank you for your time, and for being so open about the in-house plan. I do appreciate it.
  56. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    Well, you'd have heard anyway. Thanks, Daniel.
  57. Daniel Okafor
    Daniel Okafor
    Speak on Friday. Enjoy what's left of the afternoon. Best wishes.
  58. Helen Marsden
    Helen Marsden
    You too. Bye for now.

BG-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Glass is the tool. Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Glass is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask B (the speech bubble) in the header, or open the Ask B page. Type a question, or pick one of the suggestions.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations225
People at customers862
BG-Demo staff records (in post and leavers)58
Calls1,995
Email threads3,013
Support tickets1,159
Documents1,218
Deals315
Invoices285
Events49
News items119

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the AI from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BG-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Glass is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email info@b-glass.uk or talk to your B-Glass account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Help

Ask B

B-Glass · read-only