B-Glass
Calderbrook Housing Group logo

Calderbrook Housing Group - Renewal Proposal v1

Documentdraft

Calderbrook Housing Group logo Calderbrook Housing Group · renewal proposal · draft · 10 Jun 2026

Internal draft renewal proposal by Tom Ashdown for the Growth subscription, with a current term ending 1 Sep 2026. It states contracted annual recurring revenue of £44k and 40 licensed users. It recommends Option B with Option C as fallback. Not shared with the customer.

What it says

What this says

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Internal draft renewal proposal by Tom Ashdown for the Growth subscription, with a current term ending 1 Sep 2026. It states contracted annual recurring revenue of £44k and 40 licensed users. It recommends Option B with Option C as fallback. Not shared with the customer.

What it is: an internal draft written on 10 Jun 2026 by Tom Ashdown. It says "Not yet shared with the customer" and "This draft has not been approved for release."

Commits: nothing. It is not a contract, and no service levels are stated. It records the Growth tier, 40 licensed users, £44k contracted annual recurring revenue and a term end of 1 Sep 2026.

Unusual: it reads usage as softer, with fewer than five active users a month against 40 licensed. It flags an unconfirmed suggestion of an in-house platform and says expansion is "not credible at present".

Not settled: "No figure below other than the current contract is confirmed." The renewal price, notice date and who sponsors the brain are open, and the executed order form must decide the contracted terms. The term end of 1 Sep 2026 is before the as-of date, so the document is stale and the evidence does not show what happened next.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

As found in this document

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • Date end1 Sep 2026Source: the AI read of this record
  • Date renewal1 Sep 2026Source: the AI read of this record
  • Price£44,000Source: the AI read of this record
  • Licensed users40Source: the AI read of this record
  • Current term ends1 Sep 2026Source: the AI read of this record
  • Contracted annual recurring revenue£44,000Source: the AI read of this record

The document

Body

Calderbrook Housing Group - Renewal Proposal v1

Status: Draft. Prepared by Tom Ashdown, Account Executive, BG-Demo, on Wednesday 10 June 2026. Not yet shared with the customer. Open points are listed at the end of the document.

CustomerCalderbrook Housing Group, Leeds
SubscriptionGrowth tier
Customer sinceMonday 2 September 2024
Current term ends1 Sep 2026
Contracted annual recurring revenue£44k
Licensed users40
BG-Demo account ownerTom Ashdown
Customer success managerDaniel Okafor

1. Purpose of this document

Calderbrook's Growth subscription comes up for renewal at the start of September. This proposal sets out where the account stands, what we believe renewal should look like, and what we need to understand from Calderbrook before we put a firm commercial offer in front of them.

We want to be straightforward from the start: the usage picture is softer than we would like, and this document does not pretend otherwise. The aim is a renewal that matches how the brain is actually being used, rather than one that simply rolls the existing arrangement forward.

Read the whole document (7,281 characters)

2. Why Calderbrook bought the brain

Calderbrook is a housing association working across West Yorkshire. The business-intelligence team brought the brain in to pull tenant calls, repairs tickets, complaints and rent arrears into a single, board-ready picture, without analysts reconciling those systems by hand each month.

That original purpose is still the right yardstick. The renewal question is whether the brain is still the thing that produces that picture for the board.

3. Where the account stands today

3.1 Usage

  • Licensed users sit at 40 under the Growth tier, but the number of people actually active in a typical month is now fewer than five.
  • Average active users have fallen by roughly a third against the previous quarter.
  • The evidence we hold does not tell us who has stopped using the brain, or whether the remaining users are concentrated in the original business-intelligence team.

The gap between licensed and active users is the central issue. A Growth subscription is sized for several teams. Calderbrook currently looks like one small team.

3.2 Support and service

  • Three tickets were raised in the last month, none of them high priority.
  • There are no overdue invoices. Calderbrook has paid on time throughout.

This matters for how we read the account. Calderbrook is not unhappy about service, and it is not a payment risk. The concern is about value and adoption, and quiet tickets from a shrinking user base can be the silence before a customer leaves, not a sign of health.

3.3 What we have heard

There is a suggestion on the account record that Calderbrook has been looking at an in-house platform as an alternative. We have not had that confirmed directly and it is not something we should assume in conversation. It is something Tom and Daniel need to ask about openly.

4. Our assessment

AreaReadingDirection
Renewal at current termsAt riskThreat to the renewal
Seat utilisationWell below the licensed allowanceThreat, and a possible case to resize
Payment behaviourCleanNeutral
Support experienceQuiet, no escalationsNeutral
ExpansionNot credible at presentNone

The main engine affected is the renewal itself: keeping the subscription at a price and size Calderbrook can justify. Expansion is not a realistic conversation until adoption recovers.

5. Renewal options

No figure below other than the current contract is confirmed. Commercial terms are for Tom to confirm before anything goes to the customer.

Option A: Renew Growth as it stands

  • Keep the Growth tier with 40 licensed users at the existing annual recurring revenue of £44k, moving to the current list price at renewal as the price book requires.
  • Any first-term discount ends at renewal.
  • Calderbrook was told about the list price change earlier this year.

Risk: Calderbrook would be paying more for a brain that fewer people use. This is the option most likely to prompt a hard look at an in-house alternative.

Option B: Renew Growth with an adoption plan

  • Same tier and licensed users as Option A.
  • Daniel Okafor leads a structured re-engagement across the teams that were meant to benefit, including repairs, complaints and rent arrears.
  • Quarterly business reviews continue under the Growth tier, with a clear measure of questions asked and active users agreed in advance.

Risk: it depends on Calderbrook committing people's time. Without a named sponsor on their side it will not change the numbers.

Option C: Step down to Starter

  • Move to the Starter tier, which is built for one team and a smaller user allowance.
  • Retain the core pages, chat and search, and the connectors that matter most to the business-intelligence team.
  • Lose the dashboards builder and the quarterly business reviews, replaced by a six-monthly check-in.

Risk: it reduces annual recurring revenue, and may close off the original ambition of a board-ready picture across several teams. It is, however, better than losing the account.

6. Recommendation

We recommend leading with Option B and keeping Option C ready as a fallback. Going to Calderbrook with a price increase and no plan for adoption is the weakest position we could take.

The order of events matters:

  1. Tom and Daniel speak to the business-intelligence lead first, to understand the current state of play and whether an in-house platform is genuinely being considered.
  2. Daniel produces a short usage review that shows, in plain terms, who is asking questions and who is not.
  3. Only then do we send a formal proposal, with a clear view of what Calderbrook will pay and what they will get.

7. Timeline

StepOwnerTiming
Internal review of this draftTom Ashdown, Daniel OkaforThis week
Conversation with the customer's business-intelligence leadTom AshdownAs soon as a slot can be agreed
Usage review shared with the customerDaniel OkaforBefore any commercial offer
Formal proposal issuedTom AshdownAhead of the notice period
Current term ends1 Sep 2026

The renewal notice period is owned by the customer success manager, and the date for it must be confirmed against the executed order form, which decides the contracted terms.

8. Open points

  • Confirm the renewal price against the current price book and the executed order form, not the CRM amount.
  • Establish who at Calderbrook now sponsors the brain and whether that person has changed.
  • Check whether any connector has stopped loading, which would also explain softer usage.
  • Confirm what Calderbrook has said, if anything, about an in-house platform.
  • Agree internally how far we are prepared to move on price and tier before the first conversation.
  • Decide whether to offer a short extension to the current term if the discussion needs more time.

9. Approval

This draft has not been approved for release.

RoleNameStatus
Account ExecutiveTom AshdownDraft prepared
Customer Success ManagerDaniel OkaforReview pending
Documentsmade from

Unusual terms

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • Draft not shared with customer
  • Three renewal options, none confirmed
  • Renewal notice date unconfirmed

BG-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Glass is the tool. Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Glass is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask B (the speech bubble) in the header, or open the Ask B page. Type a question, or pick one of the suggestions.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations225
People at customers862
BG-Demo staff records (in post and leavers)58
Calls1,995
Email threads3,013
Support tickets1,159
Documents1,218
Deals315
Invoices285
Events49
News items119

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the AI from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BG-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Glass is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email info@b-glass.uk or talk to your B-Glass account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Help

Ask B

B-Glass · read-only