B-Glass
Priya Raman

Lunesdale Homes / BG-Demo – Discovery

Callcompleted

Lunesdale Homes logo Lunesdale Homes · 11 Dec 2025 13:45

Discovery call with Lunesdale Homes. The insight team spends about two weeks each quarter reconciling complaints by hand. Finance wants whole-life cost, procurement clarity and a comparison before any decision.

What was said

What this says

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Discovery call with Lunesdale Homes. The insight team spends about two weeks each quarter reconciling complaints by hand. Finance wants whole-life cost, procurement clarity and a comparison before any decision.

What happened: Priya Raman ran discovery with Alison Mawdsley and Christopher Bamber. Alison described complaints reconciled by hand across the contact centre, repairs and housing management systems.

Customer view: Alison wants a trend the board can trust and evidence for the regulator. She is wary of overclaiming and would rather see a small thing done properly.

Commercial: Priya mentioned a pencilled deal amount of £140k for Enterprise, total deal value with implementation, and a 16 Jan 2026 target. Christopher wants whole-life cost in writing, will not negotiate on a call and expects a comparison.

Watch: Procurement route is unconfirmed and in-house is an alternative. Christopher has other priorities this year and will not decide on a single option.

AI · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as at Fri 9 Oct 2026

Themes

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
Theme
Complaints reconciliation, Enterprise discovery
Importance
upsell
Sentiment
mixed
Voice
decision-maker

Who was there

BG-Demo

Them

Follow-up

Next steps

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • Priya Raman sends procurement a short description of what is bought and how it is delivered.
  • Priya Raman schedules a demo on a narrow slice of repairs complaints data.
  • Alison Mawdsley sends a rough estimate of analyst effort, aiming for before the end of the year.

Risks

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • Christopher expects a comparison, including in-house, and will not decide on a single option.
  • Procurement route is unconfirmed and could lengthen the cycle.
  • Alison is wary of overclaiming, so the demo must prove value on a narrow slice.

Opportunities

As at Fri 9 Oct 2026
  • A clear pain point: about two weeks of manual reconciliation each quarter across three main systems.
  • Enterprise fit for about eighteen thousand homes across Lancashire and Cumbria, starting with insight and repairs teams.

Transcript

  1. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Hello, hello. Can you hear me all right? I'm never sure with this headset.
  2. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Yes, fine. Good afternoon, Priya. Christopher's just coming in.
  3. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Good afternoon. Apologies, I was on another call that overran.
  4. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    No problem at all, thanks for joining. So, a quick recap of where we are. We spoke briefly a couple of weeks ago, today is discovery, so I'd love to hear how you work, what hurts, and then we can look at what an Enterprise setup might look like. I'm conscious of Christopher's time, so I'll keep us moving.
  5. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Before we go further, what is the commercial position at this stage?
  6. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Sure. Honestly, it's early, so nothing is fixed. We've pencilled in a deal amount of £140,000 for Enterprise, which is a total deal value with implementation included, and a target of 16 January 2026 on our side. But today is about whether it fits, not about the number.
  7. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    I see. I'd want to understand the whole-life cost, not just the headline. And I would not negotiate on a call.
  8. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Completely understood. We'll put everything in writing, and you can take your time over it.
  9. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    If I may, I'll start with the latest complaint data, because it frames why I asked for this. For the last quarter, the insight team reconciled complaints from the contact centre, the repairs system and the housing management system by hand. It took the better part of two weeks for each board report.
  10. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Two weeks. By hand. Right. And that's every quarter?
  11. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Every quarter, and the numbers don't always agree between the sources. Which estate a complaint relates to is sometimes recorded, sometimes not.
  12. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Okay, that's really helpful. So the pain is the stitching together, and then the trust in the output.
  13. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Exactly. The board wants to see the trend, not the anecdote. And I'd like the regulator to look at how we handle complaints and recognise it as good practice. At the moment I can't evidence that quickly.
  14. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    And how many homes are we talking about, just so I picture the scale?
  15. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    About eighteen thousand homes across Lancashire and Cumbria. The insight team and the repairs teams would be the first users.
  16. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Lovely. And which systems feed those two teams? Just the ones you named, or more?
  17. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Those three mainly, plus the email inbox for the complaints team and the survey results. Surveys are held separately.
  18. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Right. So what we do is put one layer over those sources, built inside your own Snowflake account, and your teams ask it questions in plain language. So instead of two weeks of reconciling, someone asks, for example, which estate had the most repeat repair complaints, and gets an answer with the evidence behind it.
  19. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Which estate. Yes, that is the question. And what does the tenant experience in that chain? That's what I keep coming back to.
  20. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Good point. You'd see the complaint, the repair history and the follow-ups together, so you can see whether the tenant was left waiting. I'd want to show you that on your own data in a demo, rather than tell you.
  21. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    I would want that. I'm wary of anything that overclaims. I'd rather see it do a small thing properly.
  22. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Happy to make this easy. We'd scope the demo narrowly, say repairs complaints for one area, and you judge it on that.
  23. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Is this a framework purchase, or would it go out to tender? I need to know how procurement would treat it.
  24. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    I'd assume it follows our normal procurement route. I'm not going to skip that, Christopher. I'll confirm with the procurement team.
  25. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    That's fine from our side. We work within whatever route you need. If it helps, I can send a short description of what is being bought and how it's delivered, so procurement can classify it.
  26. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Please do. And I would expect a comparison. We have other priorities this year, and I won't decide on a single option.
  27. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Of course. Sensible. I won't pretend there aren't alternatives, including doing it in-house. What would you want a comparison to cover? Cost, effort, time to value?
  28. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Cost over the life of the contract, internal effort, and what the board would see as a saving. Not a feature list.
  29. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    I can help with the saving side. The two weeks of analyst time each quarter is real. I can put the effort on paper, though I'd not want to inflate it.
  30. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    That would be great, Alison, and honest numbers are better for everyone. So let me pull the next steps together. I'll send the short description for procurement. We schedule a demo on a narrow slice of your repairs complaints data. And Alison, you send me a rough view of the analyst effort.
  31. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Yes. I'll aim to do that before the end of the year, with the caveat that it's an estimate.
  32. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    And I will see the commercial detail in writing, not on a call.
  33. Priya Raman
    Priya Raman
    Yes, in writing, once we've been through the demo and know what the scope is. Thanks both. That was really useful.
  34. Alison Mawdsley
    Alison Mawdsley
    Thank you, Priya. Speak soon.
  35. Christopher Bamber
    Christopher Bamber
    Thank you. Goodbye.

BG-Demo is a fictional company; every organisation and person here is invented. B-Glass is the tool. Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Help & Support

Help & Support

Open as a page

Help & Support

B-Glass is one place to read everything the company knows about its customers: the CRM, calls, emails, support tickets, product usage, invoices, documents, news and HR. Every page is built from those systems and the data is current to Fri 9 Oct 2026.

How to use the site

How to ask

Press Ask B (the speech bubble) in the header, or open the Ask B page. Type a question, or pick one of the suggestions.

What the data covers

DataRecords
Organisations225
People at customers862
BG-Demo staff records (in post and leavers)58
Calls1,995
Email threads3,013
Support tickets1,159
Documents1,218
Deals315
Invoices285
Events49
News items119

Data as of Fri 9 Oct 2026. Text marked AI was written by the AI from the records listed in its made-from link; an AI output that cannot cite its evidence is refused and the previous text kept. Where two systems disagree (for example a contract and the CRM), the key facts show both values and mark the difference.

BG-Demo is a fictional company: every organisation, person and figure here is invented for this demonstration. B-Glass is the tool that reads its data.

Who to contact

Email info@b-glass.uk or talk to your B-Glass account team. Tell us the page address and what looked wrong; a screenshot helps.

Help

Ask B

B-Glass · read-only